After over a decade of playing Super Smash Bros. Melee casually, I entered the world of competitive play late in 2013, and entered my first tournament in January of 2014. At the time, I was all about Sheik.
I long prided myself on my spacing and bait-heavy style, as well as utilizing grabs as well as anyone. No matter who I'm using, tech-chasing is a huge strength of mine. Whether it be on flat ground or covering someone's landing on a platform, I'm pretty good at landing another hit on my opponent.
Naturally, Sheik was a perfect fit. With a low barrier of entry when it comes to technical ability, she was quick to pick up, and I could hang with my superior brother, JKJ, and others, even though they were more experienced.
It seemed like a perfect match, but it wasn't to last.
I've talked about this before in other posts, but I'm really not about playing lame. Sure, my style is slower paced and more about movement, but I like to be creative. Unless my opponent is playing unbelievably campy, I'm not going to sit back at all times and sit on the ledge, even with Sheik's ledge stall.
And that's when I came to the realization: while Sheik's moveset and punish game fit my style, her neutral game — at least in the optimal sense — doesn't.
In spring of 2014, when I began entering tournaments on a more consistent basis, I turned to Fox more and more. I constantly went back and forth between Sheik and Fox throughout the early parts of the summer before Fox became my favorite to play. My Sheik, I felt, was inconsistent. There were highs, to be sure — I once pulled a 3-to-1 stock comeback against a Fox on Yoshi's Story in a crucial game 3 with three consecutive zero-to-death punishes that included the best tech-chasing I've ever pulled off, even to this day.
My Fox, however, has allowed me to take Soup, an incredibly talented Long Island Marth, to game 3, as well as other strong players in the region. I've moved myself into the category of respectable players, although I am still near the bottom of that tier of player.
When it comes to matchups, I'm not a fan of Sheik dittos, especially if chain grabs are in play. I feel largely confident with my Fox against Sheiks, having disposed of three in my Apex 2015 pools before losing to Clue's Sheik in a close set to finish 5th. Even with that, I feel confident that a re-do of that set could easily go in my favor.
And that confidence and comfort in matchups extends to basically every character not named Fox, Falco or Marth. Even against characters that Sheik has an advantage against, including Falcon, Peach and Samus, I feel a lot stronger with my Fox against those characters (although I'm getting better against Falcon. Fox is natural choice against Puff as well, even though I'm confident with my Sheik in that matchup, and it just didn't make sense to use my Sheik for literally only three, albeit important, matchups.
Fox got me far Sunday in my Vermont tournament, guiding me to 7th place out of 36 competitors, including Kage and other strong Montreal competition. But Sheik is still my choice in doubles, and I've seen tremendous success against a lot of players whenever I bring her out. I've wanted to leave Sheik behind, as I feel my relative aggressiveness could work against me with that character, but many opponents — especially my brother — have felt my potential lies with Sheik, not Fox.
I don't foresee myself dropping either character, no matter who I decide to push forward with, but I'm at a point in my competitive Melee career where I think I need to make a decision. It's hard enough to learn the game as one character, and if I'm going to improve, splitting my time evenly between the two seems counter-productive. And the more I listen to top players talk, and the more I examine my own play, my neutral is simply sloppy — no character choice will correct that. But that point also makes the choice more difficult.
So help me smashers: What direction do I go in? Fox or Sheik?